Kate hoax nurse Jacintha Saldanha, 46, ‘blamed herself’. http://tinyurl.com/l2v3pss
First of all, I want to give my condolences to the family of Jacintha Saldanha, 46, RIP. I am unable to bring the person back to life, but help to break the codigo of silence in the matter and gain justice. I believe strong this case is what we call in law, as Preliminary Murder. A preliminary murder/crime is the one that is committed for purpose of effect some other crime. The clever people who done the crime, as one of the steps taken towards a great (planed) crime, with 3 offenses in mind: incitement (solicitation), conspiracy (agreement between two or more persons) and attempt (murder). In this case, maybe as Jacintha Saldanha disclosed matters that she should not be saying in public, for whatever reasons, as in this case again the matter was “The Royal Family affairs”-
-It was done the crime in a way, to show/frame the side of the Royal Family, but I can guaranty to the Saldhanha Family with respect, that the mattters/allegations are untrue.
-It was done the crime in a way, “as if” Jacintha Saldanha took her own life, but again untrue and twice, one by the matron and another by her husband, so no way. As the matron added: “There was no indication that she wasn’t coping, she was seen as coping. Jacintha Saldanha husband said: He told the inquest that she had never suffered from any psychological problems or tried to harm herself.
-It was done the crime in a way, as if staff of the NHS has somenthing to do with it and hide the real person, crime and motives, but again I have not seing the papers and I can not comment any further, but I hold in my blog several acts and crimes by that system, so is 50/50.
-It was done the crime in a way, as “if to teach a lesson to the victim (Jacintha Saldanha)”, but again I need to see the papers.
-It was done the crime in a way, as to blame the pranks people and hold Michael Christian or Ms Greig responsible for the broadcast. What I believe is the matter, opened the way and forced Prince William and His wife to visit the country, with Baby George.
-It was done the crime in many ways to mislead, twist and corrupt the legal system.
The severity of the problem, that I am unable to carry on commenting without seeing the court papers, but the Judge may get things wrong, mix up, twist, corrupt, mislead, etc. In other words, I am unable to carry on disclosing any further than the law permit, as in this ocassion (a) I do not hold the papers of the case itself. (b) I am unemployed and I need the job badly. (c) I am studing law at home by myself and I do not hold the law certificate, but working towards a qualification/recomendation. However, In the past people concern of the following cases stole from my blog and notes see as: “As example” in the following link: http://tinyurl.com/kwscgff In which, some of the cases were open again and the solicitors firm got my job, revenue and fee’s, thanks to my blog. I protect anything that concerns Princess Diana of Wales two children as the Lady in question is not here (RIP) with us to do the matters herself, because of that matters alone, that I am happy to assist both parties. As Jacintha Saldanha family need to know the true as well of mother and wife, but Lady Di two children had been framed in the past and reasons of me, to protect them both legally in advocacy.
As again, I do not hold the case papers and I need a wage to survive in the UK, as all gone and removed from me in the area and without reasons, or set of reasons, even if by law, but hide in “confidentiality acts” to cover the crime, criminal action and criminal activity against my persona, with any tales and lies. http://goo.gl/rh3UzY I hope Saldanha family understand my reasons of protecting both cases (Lady Diana Spencer children and themselves), after reading the links as mention before. I am not register as self employed, but the same law give you 3 months “before” anyone register for self employed, in any job relate and I am just starting (10/9/2014). Please anyone interested give us a call (email@example.com), if you need me and “without prejudice” with thanks, Rosario Castellanos de Parker.
POLITE REQUEST THIS NOTE IS FREE BUT PROTECTED WITH COPY RIGHTS. ESTA NOTA ES GRATUITA, PROHIBÍDO SU REPRODUCCIÓN Ó DISTRIBUICIÓN, RENTADA Ó IMPORTADA CON INTERESES EDUCATIVOS, POLITÍCOS Ó ECONOMICOS, USANDO PALABRAS SIMILARES Ó PARCIALES, BAJO LA PROTECCIÓN DE LA ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL, DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL (OMPI) SIN ANTES OBTENER PERMISO DE ROSARIO CASTELLANOS RUIZ.. Mayo2010. http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.html#reprod